Перед цим Комітет Сенату США з міжнародних відносин одноголосно затвердив кандидатуру дипломатки Бріджит Брінк на посаду посла
…
In February, the Nigerian technology startup CrowdForce announced a big break: It had received $3.6 million from investors to expand its financial services operations to many more underserved communities.
Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Tomi Ayorinde said new funding will boost its mobile agent network from 7,000 to 21,000 this year.
“We were looking to scale faster and really gain market share,” Ayorinde said. “And what we’re doing is also very impact-related because we’re creating jobs, avenues for people to make extra income in their communities. So, it was also very interesting for impact investors to be part of what we’re trying to do.”
When Ayorinde helped launch CrowdForce seven years ago, he intended it to be a data collection company. But after about two years, the company overhauled its business model when Ayorinde realized it could fill a need for bank accounts.
“When we collected data of 4.5 million traders what we saw was, a lot of them didn’t have bank accounts and the ones that have bank accounts had a very tough time accessing the cash that was sent to them,” said Ayorinde.”That’s when we kind of realized that there’s a bigger problem to solve here.”
Experts say about 60% of Africa’s 1.2 billion people lack access to banks or financial services. Technology startups in Africa are trying to fix that, said the African Private Equity and Venture Capital Association known as AVCA.
In a recent report, the industry group said African startups attracted $5.2 billion in venture capital last year, and that West Africa – led by Nigeria – accounted for the largest share of investments.
AVCA research manager Alexia Alexandropoulou said investors are looking to tap into Africa’s huge population of young people.
“Africa is the world’s most youthful population, so as the proportion of skilled labor increases, then the result will be more human capital in order to power African businesses and also the industrial development within the continent,” said Alexandropoulou.
AVCA’s report also cites increased internet penetration in Africa and more favorable government policies as contributing to increased investments in financial technology services knwoFintech.
But Fintech Digital Marketing Expert Louis Dike said there are obstacles to overcome, such as weak currencies and policies.
“Africa is not a perfect place because it’s still made up of virgin markets,” said Dike. “The standard of living is quite low, our regulations are not consistent, today the government will say this and tomorrow they will change the law and restrict some startup activities.”
But with new talents emerging in technology, more startups with big dreams are emerging in Nigeria and elsewhere in Africa.
Read MoreTesla CEO Elon Musk says his deal to buy Twitter can’t move forward unless the company shows public proof that less than 5% of the accounts on the social media platform are fake or spam.
Musk made the comment in a reply to another user on Twitter early Tuesday. He spent much of the previous day in a back-and-forth with Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal, who posted a series of tweets explaining his company’s effort to fight bots and how it has consistently estimated that less than 5% of Twitter accounts are fake.
In his tweet Tuesday, Musk said that “20% fake/spam accounts, while 4 times what Twitter claims, could be much higher. My offer was based on Twitter’s SEC filings being accurate.”
He added: “Yesterday, Twitter’s CEO publicly refused to show proof of 5%. This deal cannot move forward until he does.”
Twitter declined to comment.
It’s Musk’s latest salvo over inauthentic accounts, a problem he has said he wants to rid Twitter of.
At a Miami technology conference Monday, Musk estimated that at least 20% of Twitter’s 229 million accounts are spam bots, a percentage he said was at the low end of his assessment.
The battle over spam accounts kicked off last week when Musk tweeted that the Twitter deal was on on hold pending confirmation of the company’s estimates that they make up less than 5% of total users.
Also at the All In Summit, Musk gave the strongest hint yet that he would like to pay less for Twitter than the $44 billion offer he made last month.
Musk’s comments are likely to bolster theories from analysts that the billionaire either wants out of the deal or to buy the company at a cheaper price. His tweet Tuesday came in reply to one from a Tesla news site speculating that Musk “may be looking for a better Twitter deal as $44 billion seems too high.”
“Twitter shares will be under pressure this morning again as the chances of a deal ultimately getting done is not looking good now,” Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, who covers both Twitter and Tesla, said in a research note. He estimated that there’s “60%+ chance” that Musk ends up walking away from the deal and paying the $1 billion breakup fee.
Musk made the offer to buy Twitter for $54.20 per share on April 14. Twitter shares have slid since then. They were down slightly in Tuesday morning trading to $37.28.
To finance the acquisition, Musk pledged some of his Tesla shares, which have slumped by about a third since the deal was announced.
In tweets on Monday, Agrawal acknowledged Twitter isn’t perfect at catching bots. He wrote that every quarter, the company has made the estimate of less than 5% spam. “Our estimate is based on multiple human reviews of thousands of accounts that are sampled at random, consistently over time,” Agrawal wrote.
Estimates for the last four quarters were all well under 5%, he wrote. “The error margins on our estimates give us confidence in our public statements each quarter.”
Twitter has put the under 5% estimate in its quarterly filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for at least the last two years, well before Musk made his offer last month.
But in the filings, Twitter expressed doubts that its count of bot accounts was correct, conceding that the estimate may be low.
…
Після офіційної публікації закону про заборону діяльності проросійських партій Міністерство юстиції подасть судовий позов про заборону таких партій до апеляційного суду у Львові. Про це в ефірі телемарафону повідомив міністр юстиції Денис Малюська.
«Найгучніша партія, яку розглядатиме суд, – це, безумовно, ОПЗЖ. У нас є необхідна доказова база. Тобто ми керуємося не лише рішенням РНБО, а ще й маємо докази їхньої проросійськості. Очікуємо, що такий судовий розгляд буде досить швидким. Тому що закон, ухвалений Верховною Радою, встановлює дуже стислі строки для розгляду справи судом: максимум один місяць як для установ першої інстанції, так і апеляційної. Відповідно, якщо Львівський адміністративний апеляційний суд дотримається строків, встановлених законом, – вже всередині цього літа ми матимемо перші результати по кільком проросійським партіям», – повідомив Малюська.
Щодо ОПЗЖ – за наявності позитивного рішення суду партія припинять своє існування і буде виключена з реєстру політичних партій України, додав Малюська.
При цьому він запевнив, що навіть, поки рішення суду не вступить у дію, функціонувати проросійські партії в Україні не зможуть.
«До нас іноді надходять рішення керівних органів цих політичних партій про реєстрацію тих чи інших змін. Втім ми цього не робимо, адже партія не може функціонувати на період її призупинення. По кожній політичній партії буде окремий судовий процес. Врешті-решт, наша перевага над країною-агресором у тому, що ми не «зачищаємо» політичне поле грубо, з порушення процедурних норм, як це практикують у тоталітарних державах. Нам же потрібні правові механізми, тому що це не тільки цінність демократії, але й можливість для політичних партій оскарження рішення у міжнародних судах», – сказав міністр.
14 травня Володимир Зеленський підписав закон про заборону проросійських політичних партій. Перед тим президент 20 березня ввів у дію указ РНБО про припинення діяльності низки проросійських партій, серед них і ОПЗЖ, «Наші» та «Партія Шарія». Загалом 11 політичних партій.
…